Introduction: What Boat Fishing Taught Me About the Absence of a Single Right Answer
Since I started boat fishing, I have gradually come to feel that fishing is somewhat different from an activity in which you simply “figure out” how to beat the fish.
Through a rod and line, you play with fish in the natural world, experiment with different approaches, and sometimes confront them directly.
An angler chooses a location, thinks about the tackle, imagines what may be happening underwater, and puts a line in the water.
But whether a fish ultimately bites is not decided by human intention alone.
Fishing, I think, is an attempt to recreate a rare success through deliberate action inside a natural world that refuses to behave exactly as we want it to.
That is why fishing has no single right answer.
Every angler still has room to discover a personal way of enjoying the activity and a personal way of approaching the fish.
Chapter 1: Fishing and Circuit Time Attack Differ in Reproducibility
One activity I often compare with fishing is circuit time attack.
If the same driver repeatedly drives the same car on the same circuit under similar conditions, lap times tend to converge within a relatively narrow range.
Change the racing line, braking technique, throttle application, or vehicle setup, and the effect can often be compared through lap times.
In other words, it is an activity in which the relationship between what you change and the result is relatively easy to observe.
Fishing is very different.
Tide, water temperature, current, turbidity, wind, light, baitfish, the location of fish schools, and the activity level of the fish are all constantly changing.
Return to yesterday’s productive spot at the same time with the same tackle, and the result may be entirely different.
“This spot looks promising.”
“This lure may get a reaction.”
“There may be predators beneath the baitfish.”
Experience like this provides clues for deciding what to try next.
But reproducing the same cast under the same conditions again and again is extremely difficult.
Fishing itself has low reproducibility.
Chapter 2: It Is Difficult to Know Why That Particular Fish Bit
Why was the fish in that particular place?
Why did it bite that particular lure or bait at that particular moment?
Establishing the exact causal chain behind one individual fish is difficult.
The fish finder may show something that looks like fish.
There may be baitfish nearby.
The tide may appear favorable.
And still, nothing bites.
Then, in a place where you expected very little, a fish may suddenly take the lure.
There is a considerable gap between “there is a fish here” and “that fish will bite my presentation.”
So anglers think.
Was I fishing at the wrong depth?
Was the rig unsuitable?
Should I change the way I work the lure?
And then they try something else.
Because the reason behind the result can never be read with complete certainty, there is always another experiment to try.
That uncertainty is part of what makes fishing interesting.
Chapter 3: Trying to Make a Rare Event Happen Again
There are many fish in the sea.
Only a very small proportion of them will bite your tackle, become hooked, and ultimately make it all the way to the boat.
Yet once a fish has been caught, people naturally want to make the same thing happen again.
They return to the same place.
They use the same tackle.
They look for a similar tide.
Using the previous experience as a clue, they try to call back a success that occurred only rarely.
I think this is one of the essential forms of fishing.
Nature is slightly different every time.
Sometimes the fish bite again.
Sometimes nothing happens at all.
As I wrote in No Catch? No Problem ★ Enjoying Boat Fishing Through Imagination and Experimentation, I regard this lack of reproducibility as part of fishing itself.
If I catch nothing, I can simply think again.
Chapter 4: People Have Always Chased Fish That Refuse to Cooperate
Human beings have been fishing for a very long time.
Rods, lines, hooks, bait, lures, boats, and fish finders.
The equipment has changed dramatically.
Modern anglers can use sophisticated fish finders to look beneath the surface.
We have electronic charts and GPS.
Tide and weather information are easy to obtain.
As our knowledge and equipment improve, we gain more information with which to understand nature.
And yet the final question—whether a fish will actually bite—still depends on what happens underwater.
The more we learn, the more clearly we can also see the parts that remain outside our control.
That structure reminds me of life.
Chapter 5: Literature About Fishing Often Reveals Something About Life
When I read literature about fishing, I repeatedly encounter themes that overlap with human life: challenge, stillness, play, and adventure.
Ernest Hemingway | What Remains After the Result Is Lost
In The Old Man and the Sea, the old fisherman Santiago struggles with an enormous fish.
After finally securing his great catch, sharks consume most of it on the journey home, leaving little more than the skeleton.
Judged only by the final result, he fails to bring the great fish home intact.
But the endurance, skill, and will he demonstrated along the way do not disappear with the flesh of the fish.
In this story, I see one of the similarities between fishing and life:
Even when the tangible result is lost, the value of the human effort can remain.
📖 Ernest Hemingway, The Old Man and the Sea (1952)
Izaak Walton | Enjoying the Time Spent Beside the Water
Izaak Walton’s The Compleat Angler carries throughout it a view of fishing as a way to spend quiet time in nature.
Go to the water.
Watch the natural world.
Think.
Wait.
Catching a fish has value, but so does the time spent doing all of those other things.
Fishing is not an activity whose meaning exists only in the final result.
That sensibility still makes perfect sense in modern fishing.
📖 Izaak Walton, The Compleat Angler (first published in 1653)
Kōda Rohan | The Fish Is Not the Only Purpose
Kōda Rohan was a Japanese writer who left a number of works about fishing.
In Yūgyo no Setsu — Ishii-shi Chōsho ni Daisu, an essay on fishing and recreation, he presents fishing as something more than a means of acquiring fish: it is also a form of recreation.
If obtaining fish were the only objective, there would be more efficient ways to get them.
Yet people still take a rod to the water.
Applied to modern boat fishing, I think this means that the catch is only one part of the pleasure.
How did I search for the fish?
What did I think about?
What kind of day did I spend on the water?
All of that becomes part of fishing.
That idea closely matches what I have come to feel through my own boat fishing.
📖 Kōda Rohan, Yūgyo no Setsu — Ishii-shi Chōsho ni Daisu (1906)
Takeshi Kaikō | Adventure Into the Unknown
In Takeshi Kaikō’s Opa!, his fishing travelogue through the Amazon, the world of fishing extends far beyond the fish itself.
He travels to distant places in search of great fish, and the land, rivers, people, food, and natural surroundings all become part of the journey.
I see in this the adventurous nature of fishing.
There may be a fish I have never seen before.
There may be waters I have never visited.
I want to go there and see.
Fishing can become a reason to venture into the unknown.
📖 Takeshi Kaikō, Opa! (1978)
Chapter 6: Fishing Resembles Life Because It Does Not Go as Planned
Life moves forward through countless small decisions.
We make an effort.
We think.
We prepare.
And then chance—something beyond our control—also enters into the result.
Fishing is much the same.
Choose a location.
Think about the tackle.
Use experience.
Then wait for a response from the fish.
If the result is good, you are pleased.
If nothing happens, you think about what to try next.
You accept that reality did not unfold as you wanted, and then decide on the next move.
That, to me, is one of the strongest similarities between fishing and life.
The next move begins with your own experience and your own best guess.
You try it.
Then you see what happens.
That is where the space for humans to play with nature exists.
Conclusion: Fishing Is a Way of Playing in a World That Does Not Go as Planned
Fishing has location choice, equipment, technique, and experience.
Improving those things can increase your chances of encountering fish.
And in the end, there are still conditions belonging to nature and to the fish themselves.
What worked yesterday may produce a completely different result today.
So you think about the next move.
You put the line in the water again.
Sometimes you catch a fish.
Sometimes you do not.
Fishing is a way of continuing to try what you can in a world that does not unfold exactly as you want it to.
That structure looks remarkably similar to life.
Enjoy the days when nothing bites as well.
Do not treat only the successful days as the whole of life.
Perhaps it is precisely this way of relating to uncertainty that makes both fishing and life a little richer.
Want to know more about the author and the thinking behind this site?
→ About Rikutsu-Kone-Taro
